AI Visibility Statistics & Benchmarks

Benchmark data from rocketblue's monitoring of AI-generated responses, brand mentions, citations, and source behavior across major AI search platforms.

View detailed report →

AI Assistant Market Share · October 2026

Estimated monthly active users across major AI assistants. This is usage share, not the citation behavior below.

Current Snapshot

  • Microsoft Copilotest. 150–420M · 3%
  • Claudeest. 19–245M · 2%
  • Grokest. 60–150M · 2%
  • Perplexityest. 45–230M · 1%

Share Over Time

July 2026September 2026October 20260%15%30%45%60%
Data table and sources

Google's three surfaces are carried forward unchanged from Alphabet's Q2 2026 earnings call (Aug 21, 2026) — the Q3 2026 call is scheduled for ~Oct 28, 2026 and had not yet reported as of this compile. ChatGPT uses OpenAI's own DevDay 2026 disclosure (Sept 29, 2026) of 1.2B weekly users — the most recent official figure available, though it is weekly rather than monthly active users, so the true MAU figure is likely somewhat higher. Copilot, Claude, Grok, and Perplexity remain undisclosed on a comparable monthly basis by their companies; third-party trackers continue to show wide, sometimes contradictory ranges (e.g. Copilot ranges from a Microsoft-cited ~150M 'Copilot products' figure to a ~420M 'all surfaces' estimate), so point estimates lean toward the more recent, named-source end of each range. Figures are directional, not audited; platforms that don't publish comparable MAU figures (Copilot, Claude, Grok, Perplexity) are shown as ranges compiled from third-party trackers, with the percentage share based on a point estimate within that range. Updated monthly.

Most Cited Domains

Share of cited links from major global platforms over the last four months. Pick an AI model to see the weekly trend. ChatGPT is shown first.

Share of cited links, weekly

Jun 14Jun 21Jun 28Jul 5Jul 12Jul 19Jul 26Aug 2Aug 9Aug 16Aug 23Aug 30Sep 6Sep 13Sep 20Sep 27Oct 4Oct 110%2%4%6%8%

Properties of websites that AI chatbots choose to cite

Citation Characteristics

Current benchmark profile for pages cited by tracked AI platforms.

Include bullet points

81.4% ↓

Include visual data

60.8% ↓

Include author credentials

68.0% ↓

Include empirical evidence

8.2% ↓

Include FAQs

3.1% ↓

Include original research

4.1% ↓

Types of Websites AI Cites

  • corporate website32.0%
  • non-profit organization25.8%
  • news outlet16.5%
  • academic journal11.3%
  • blog7.2%
  • government website4.1%
  • encyclopedia2.1%
  • forum1.0%

Content Formats AI Cites

  • article75.3%
  • listicle13.4%
  • research paper6.2%
  • multimedia4.1%
  • product page1.0%

Types of Content AI Cites

  • Article20.8%
  • Blog18.7%
  • Guide/Tutorial13.8%
  • Product page8.6%
  • Unknown6.5%
  • Homepage5.3%
  • Marketplace listing5.0%
  • Wiki/Knowledge base4.5%
  • Youtube3.3%
  • Other13.3%

Latest Benchmark · Oct 5, 2026 – Oct 11, 2026

Current benchmark values from the newest available reporting period, with change vs the immediately previous reporting period when that comparison exists.

Average response citation rate (across tracked platforms)

81.3% ↑

Average citations per cited response (across tracked platforms)

8.52 ↑

Average brands mentioned per response

4.59 ↑

ChatGPT responses with citations

96.8% ↑

What websites do LLMs choose to cite?

Citation Behavior by AI Platform

Platform % responses with citations Avg citations per cited response Avg brands per response
ChatGPT 96.8% 8.05 4.98
Gemini 79.8% 4.29 5.44
Claude 52.2% 9.06 5.56
Perplexity 99.6% 10.21 3.41
Google AI Overview 69.3% 9.19 3.02
AI Mode 90.0% 10.33 5.15

What's Changing in AI Search?

These findings show change based on the most recent monthly report (Oct 5, 2026 – Oct 11, 2026) .

corporate website share among cited websites: 32.0% (previous: 35.8%, change: -3.8 pp).

corporate website accounted for a smaller share of cited websites.

Average brands mentioned per response: 4.59 (previous: 4.35, change: +5.7%).

Responses mentioned more brands on average.

ChatGPT citation rate: 96.8% (previous: 95.0%, change: +1.8 pp).

ChatGPT cited sources more often.

Average response citation rate: 81.3% (previous: 80.1%, change: +1.1 pp).

Tracked platforms cited sources in a larger share of responses.

Methodology

rocketblue monitors prompts that map to brand discovery and purchase-intent questions, then collects AI-generated responses, citations, and brand mentions on a recurring reporting schedule.

The current benchmark includes tracked responses from ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overview, and Google AI Mode, based on the prompts and sampling windows in each reporting period.

A citation is counted when the model response includes a referenced source URL or an inline source reference that maps to a source document captured in the dataset.

Reporting periods are defined by each monthly snapshot's period start and end dates. New monthly reports are added as new snapshots become available.

This dataset reflects rocketblue's monitoring methodology, reporting schedule, and tracked prompt mix. It should not be interpreted as AI platform market share, real-world usage share, or representative of all AI conversations on the internet.

Based on about 2.2 million response links from United States, United Kingdom, Israel, Germany, Australia, France, India, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, and 52 more.

View detailed report →